<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Capital Assets Amortization Schedule&#8221; For The Taking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://1800hart.com/blog/2005/08/capital-assets-amortization-schedule-for-the-taking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://1800hart.com/blog/2005/08/capital-assets-amortization-schedule-for-the-taking/</link>
	<description>HART&#039;s mind works in mysterious ways .. someone should take advantage of that</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 08:10:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://1800hart.com/blog/2005/08/capital-assets-amortization-schedule-for-the-taking/comment-page-1/#comment-51547</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 12:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1800HART.com/blog/?p=114#comment-51547</guid>
		<description>&quot;No refunds!&quot;

LOL!

Yes, I don&#039;t think I would ever come across that situation in real life, but I was just playing around and thought I&#039;d mention it.  Habit from my past life as a software tester!

Great spreadsheet--very helpful!
Thanks,
Ken</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;No refunds!&#8221;</p>
<p>LOL!</p>
<p>Yes, I don&#8217;t think I would ever come across that situation in real life, but I was just playing around and thought I&#8217;d mention it.  Habit from my past life as a software tester!</p>
<p>Great spreadsheet&#8211;very helpful!<br />
Thanks,<br />
Ken</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HART (1-800-HART)</title>
		<link>http://1800hart.com/blog/2005/08/capital-assets-amortization-schedule-for-the-taking/comment-page-1/#comment-51539</link>
		<dc:creator>HART (1-800-HART)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 04:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1800HART.com/blog/?p=114#comment-51539</guid>
		<description>PS ... 

No refunds! lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS &#8230; </p>
<p>No refunds! lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HART (1-800-HART)</title>
		<link>http://1800hart.com/blog/2005/08/capital-assets-amortization-schedule-for-the-taking/comment-page-1/#comment-51538</link>
		<dc:creator>HART (1-800-HART)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 04:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1800HART.com/blog/?p=114#comment-51538</guid>
		<description>=ROUND(IF(F12-E12=0,J12*C12,(J12*C12-((E12-F12)*C12*0.5))),2)

Hmm .. I think you are right.  I probably never had that situation, or manually fixed it on the individual spreadsheets I do each year for each client.

Above is the formula for tax rate rules and, it is supposed to mimic the tax return.

Suppose in Year 1 you buy $10,000 ... at 20% ... the ending UCC would be $9,000. In Year 2 on the excel spreadsheet, the opening balance in assets of $10,000 and opening accumulated depreciation $1,000 to match.

If year 2 adds $1000 and disposes $2000  (ignoring accum.depr.) .. the formula with the =0 shows $1,700 depreciation. If you use &gt;0 it shows $1,600.

Same figures on T2 ... CCA would be $1,600

If you switch it up ($2000 additions $1000 disposals) there is no difference in the results being $1,900.00

&gt;&gt; 
Did you also test my other formulas? :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>=ROUND(IF(F12-E12=0,J12*C12,(J12*C12-((E12-F12)*C12*0.5))),2)</p>
<p>Hmm .. I think you are right.  I probably never had that situation, or manually fixed it on the individual spreadsheets I do each year for each client.</p>
<p>Above is the formula for tax rate rules and, it is supposed to mimic the tax return.</p>
<p>Suppose in Year 1 you buy $10,000 &#8230; at 20% &#8230; the ending UCC would be $9,000. In Year 2 on the excel spreadsheet, the opening balance in assets of $10,000 and opening accumulated depreciation $1,000 to match.</p>
<p>If year 2 adds $1000 and disposes $2000  (ignoring accum.depr.) .. the formula with the =0 shows $1,700 depreciation. If you use &gt;0 it shows $1,600.</p>
<p>Same figures on T2 &#8230; CCA would be $1,600</p>
<p>If you switch it up ($2000 additions $1000 disposals) there is no difference in the results being $1,900.00</p>
<p>&gt;&gt;<br />
Did you also test my other formulas? <img src='http://1800hart.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://1800hart.com/blog/2005/08/capital-assets-amortization-schedule-for-the-taking/comment-page-1/#comment-51537</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 00:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1800HART.com/blog/?p=114#comment-51537</guid>
		<description>Hiya and thanks for the spreadsheet--I was looking for exactly this!

I have a question: should the logical check in column K (i.e. Tax Rate Provisions) be &quot;&gt;=0&quot; instead of just &quot;=0&quot;?  So: &quot;=ROUND(IF(F12-E12&gt;=0,J12*C12...&quot;  I think with the logical check as &quot;=0&quot; the &quot;value if false&quot; part of the IF statement will only get executed if your Additions and Disposals are equal, whereas we want it to execute if your Additions exceed your Disposals.

I think!  I&#039;m just learning this CCA stuff, so I could very well be wrong!

Thanks again for sharing this spreadsheet!

Ken</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hiya and thanks for the spreadsheet&#8211;I was looking for exactly this!</p>
<p>I have a question: should the logical check in column K (i.e. Tax Rate Provisions) be &#8220;&gt;=0&#8243; instead of just &#8220;=0&#8243;?  So: &#8220;=ROUND(IF(F12-E12&gt;=0,J12*C12&#8230;&#8221;  I think with the logical check as &#8220;=0&#8243; the &#8220;value if false&#8221; part of the IF statement will only get executed if your Additions and Disposals are equal, whereas we want it to execute if your Additions exceed your Disposals.</p>
<p>I think!  I&#8217;m just learning this CCA stuff, so I could very well be wrong!</p>
<p>Thanks again for sharing this spreadsheet!</p>
<p>Ken</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

